Porsche 911 SC

Porsche 911 SC questions and answers

Porsche 911 SC For Sale at LemonFree Used Cars.

Q: Will a 1977 Porsche 911 SC bumper fit a 1977 Porsche 930?
Is anyone familiar with Porsche body parts? I'd much appreciate any input. How will it not fit correctly? Do you mean it won't line up with the fender properly?

A: Not correctly - the main unibody of both cars is the same, so the attachment points and hardware for pretty much all of the impact bumper cars ('74-'89 911 and 930) will be the same, but because of the different fenders on the 930, the bumpers are different (though any 930 bumper, from '76 through '89 will fit). EDIT - it can be physically fit, but the 930 bumper would be a little wider, so the SC version won't line up correctly with the fenders. Given a skilled bodyshop, you might be able to make due with a front bumper as the difference is smaller here, though the rear bumper would be a few inches off on the sides as a result of the fender flares (and even with the front, you'd be much better finding a 930 bumper rather than trying to make another one look right).

Q: What do you think of the Porsche 911 SC (year 1980) as a collectors classic?


A: In Belgium, a collector car has to be 25 years old. The Porsche 911 SC 1980 is then a collector.

Q: I seek Air Conditioning line schematics for '79 Porsche 911 SC. Anybody have them or know where to find them?


A: most all AC was aftermarket so I've seen differences and mods over the years. Try these links, they will get you going. http://dcauto.gotdns.com/catalog/index.php?mode=section&model=911&year=1978-1983&group=8§ion=813 http://www.pelicanparts.com/911/911_Parts/911_electrical_diagrams.htm or go to pca.org in the tech section, may find something there. hope it helps This is for sci; the man asked for schematics. I was not implying that he buy anything. The two links show DIAGRAMS. So thanks for the thumbs down. Paul S is correct Bentley repair manual will set you back about $80 new. Porsche sevice manuals +$1000 for a set. Don't bother with the Haynes manual as it is worthless.

Q: I'm looking for an interior for a 1983 Porsche 911 SC can anybody help?


A: Call --- Whaletail Canada. Speak to Randy or John. They are great guys and have tons of good used interiors. Many other items that may help you restoring your Porsche. 1-519-6994911. Good luck

Q: Is it required to put premium gasoline in my Porsche?
I have a 1986 Porsche 911 SC. I have been hearing that do to the engines premium gasoline is not only not required but has been suggested that you shouldn't. Just wondering if I could get a little more info on this. Thanks

A: Great question. I have a 1989 911 Carrera. The 1984-1989 line is an excellent body style, but didn't they stop calling it the SC then? The SC was made from 1978-1983. My engine recommends Shell gasoline (which amuses people when I tell them). But - directly from my mechanic - he says that premium gasoline should be used occasionally (more than one in ten, less than one in two). Otherwise, he recommended one grade down. In California, this translates to 89 most of the time, and 91 sometimes. The reason is that the premium gasoline has more cleaners/detergents in it, to "keep your engine clean". It actually gets worse gas mileage than the non-premium, which doesn't have those additives. So, you shouldn't add detergent every time, but you should use it once in awhile to clean out any deposits that may have accumulated. Of course, you should take it in every 5k miles for your oil change, and every 15k for the regular engine maintenance. Hope this helps!

Q: Would you say that cars with a higher fuel economy are a bad investment?
I've always liked classic cars, having owned a few Minis (I loved them to bits, even if they did have the structural integrity of a wet tissue). I restored and modified them tastefully on a slim budget and sold them on to first-time buyers for a healthy profit. Now I am a little older I want to try something bigger, like a Porsche 911 SC. My question is, with the current environmental climate, are cars with this sort of fuel consumption bad ideas as future investments, as people are going to be less and less likely in want of an older car that is this thirsty? Thanks!

A: How can you use the word "investment" and cars in the same sentence. Investment usually involves a rise in value. Most cars are anything but investments. If you buy one of these the fuel costs may put future buyers off, but the costs of repairs will be the main factor. they will only be investments if they are rare and loads of people chasing after the few still around.

Q: 911 or mustang?
should i buy a 1989 Porsche 911 SC or a 67 mustang

A: as an owner of both, I'll put it this way. the mustang will be cheaper, and it's a wonderful vehicle, but it's rather common. It's also not exactly spacious on the inside. It's certainly cheaper and easier to find parts. But on the whole, its not nearly as rewarding a car. It's good for straight line speed, and not much else. The brakes are basically useless, and the steering isn't much better. You have to force the car to do what you want it to. (1967 Mustang GT) The Porsche on the other hand, while not as old, is likely to garner much more attention. It's quite unique, even in big city areas, to have an older Porsche. It's a definite conversation piece. You will definitely be noticed by people of all ages, car lovers or not. Since it's one of the air-cooled cars, it'll be extremely reliable, if you buy one in good condition. When something does break though, it'll cost you some money to fix, wether or not you do the work yourself. It's also, in my honest opinion, and that of many other people, a much more rewarding car to drive. It may not have as much power as the Mustang, but being lighter gives it comparable, if not considerably better performance. (an '89 SC should be able to do 0-60 in 5.5) You still get a lot of speed, but you have handling that's incredible. The SC handles like its on rails, more of an extension of you, a finely sharpened knife to the Mustang's sledgehammer. Though to be fair, the Mustang is more forgiving of mistakes than the 911. Take a Mustang around a corner too fast, and you'll likely end up just going tail-out. Do the same in the 911, and you'll likely lose it completely. Not to mention said 911 can embarrass much newer, more expensive, and powerful cars. Our 1987 Carrera Cabriolet, with just 240 hp, is capable of beating a 06 Mustang GT, pushing 370 hp, both on the strip, and the track. If you had the money, go for the 911, you won't regret it, but spend some time researching the decision, and buy the very best car you can afford. good luck

Q: I plan to keep my car in storage (lay up) for 3 months.What are the Do's and Donts that I have to follow ?
The car is a 911 SC Porsche (1980 model)

A: Switch off the engine

Q: Ways to reduce the running costs of a 80s Porsche 911?
Hi, the old 80s 911 has always been my dream car since I was a young'un, and I've finally saved up enough to get one (and a year's insurance) at the age of 22. A few questions; 1- can you insure an 80s SC on a 'classic' package in the UK? 2. How much can I expect to spend a year on the car, and what are some simple ways to reduce this cost? 3. Realistically how much would you spend on fuel for an SC, and, if driven sensibly, are there any ways you could keep this cost lower? Thanks!

A: I can't speak for certain in regards to the insurance, as I am in the US and not sure of the specifics in the UK. However, in the US, insurance packages for classic or collector cars can be had quite inexpensively, but comes with many limitations that is designed for cars that are essentially show cars. If you intend to drive the car regularly or ever leave it unattended, etc, it's probably not an appropriate package. As for cost of ownership, the 1980s 911s are reliable cars - either the 911SC (upto '83), or the later 3.2L Carrera ('84-'89). And while there are some basic differences in the cars, ownership costs on either will probably be similar. Assuming moderate use, you will have to change the oil a couple times a year, and either car will near the occasional valve adjustment as well (every few years). Looking at total costs over ~3 years, I'd expect it to average out around $600-900/year. There are many things you can do to keep costs lower... but this is not a good car to own if you are concerned about costs. While totals costs can be low, there are many expensive parts and experienced, skilled, labor will be costly too (I recently ate a transmission at a track event and my wallet is still showing the scars). Otherwise, the best thing you can do is simply keep up the maintanance, and drive the car. Many people do not drive these cars enough! They were designed to be driven and many parts rely on being moved to stay properly lubricated. Similarly, do not use the car for short trips where the engine cannot get fully up to temperature. Costs can be kept down in areas that most Porsche owners will avoid: higher tire pressures will increase gas milage (but decrease tire grip); keeping the engines at lower rpms will also keep gas costs down... but half the fun of these old air cooled sixes is the sound they make when they're wound up!

Q: Car help please?!?!?!?
OK will £12,000 buy me a decent 911 turbo (the 3.3 930 model from the 1980's)...that's £12k just for the car itself, UK prices. Or, as a new member of the Porsche fraternity, am I better off starting with a standard SC from the same era? How different, realistically, are the two cars? Thanks!

A: um you might need to shop around 4 a gd deal